Press
Reporter's Suit Tests Right of Access to Settlement Records
A newsroom's fight to unseal a government settlement raises a recurring press-freedom question: how far does the public's right to court records extend?
When a public agency settles a lawsuit, the terms are often filed under seal. A reporter who sought to unseal one such agreement has now put a familiar question back before a federal court: what must the government show to keep court records from the public?
A presumption of openness
Courts have long recognized a presumption that judicial records are open, grounded in both common law and the First Amendment. The presumption is not absolute—privacy, trade secrets, and law-enforcement interests can outweigh it—but the party seeking secrecy bears the burden, and sealing must be narrowly tailored.
The agency here argues the settlement contains sensitive personnel information. The reporter responds that the public has a particular interest in how its money is spent to resolve claims against the government, and that redaction, not wholesale sealing, is the tailored answer.
The stakes for newsrooms
Access cases rarely make headlines, but they set the terms on which the press can report on government conduct at all. A record that stays sealed is a story that cannot be checked.
The court has set a hearing on the motion to unseal.
← Back to the front page